Victims or Actors? Part 12

How we choose

I started writing this series of essays because the subject of the Manchester arena event was provoking division among prominent dissidents. In recent years we have all been given good reason to question the offerings of media and government, but there were those that regarded questioning victims of supposed terrorist attacks as abhorrent, and others who were inclined to do so. I felt it was possible to facilitate understanding and to bridge the gap between the two positions.

To add to the suffering of the grieving is, on the face of it, a heartless act, and so if we are to question the veracity of someone’s loss, we must have good reason to do so. In relation to totalitarian agenda-serving terror events the media does not overtly provide such reasoning as it does not question state narratives. It provides us with the fear the state wants us to feel, the information it wants us believe, and the opinions it wants us to think. As a result, for most people, the notion of asking questions of alleged victims of terrorism is beyond conception.

Yet, although it may not be at the forefront of our minds, people routinely lie about their own suffering and the suffering or deaths of their loved ones. “Having covid,” has now been added to commonly told lies used to excuse missing work which include having other ailments, a sick child, a death in the family, or a funeral to attend. These excuses are utilised precisely because the taboo around questioning them puts the employer in an invidious position. Do we suppose that those who lie to gull us into accepting lethal injections would be above the lies that many among us have told?

It is important to remember that the reason why more people have begun to question the media-presented reality since 2020 is precisely because of lies about alleged victims, their numbers, their causes of death, and the nature of the illnesses they were said to have suffered.

The failure of the media and the government to report the truth of the atrocities of 9/11 and the scamdemic, demonstrate beyond any doubt the extent of the control of information in the public forum. Not only are there ongoing crimes of omission but the media played an active and vital role in the perpetration of these scams, from which horrific effects continue to be felt. The lesson from this is that the media and government constitute a, “lie machine.” To engage with the media is to be subjected to lies. We have to be as wise as the serpent with whom we are dealing and always aware of the fork in its tongue. Until it reports the truth of those seminal events we can surmise that there is a control system that prevents the media from reporting that which conflicts with the hidden agenda.

With regards to the Manchester event, it is clear from the evidence that no bomb exploded in the Manchester arena foyer. People may feel uncomfortable receiving that information before it has been approved by liars in government or media, but that is what the evidence shows. The evidence also suggests that the alleged bomber did not die but fled the arena, and had ties to intelligence services.

The state had in place plans to guide public opinion in the aftermath of such a terrorist event. These plans involved initiating floral tributes, memorial services, slogans, hashtags, and fundraising. Some of the families of victims exhibited strange behaviour, seeming unusually jovial and lacking in anger and bitterness, before going on to push for laws that serve wider state agendas (such as Martyn's law and Eve’s law). These families received millions in donations.

The government has the wherewithal to fake horrific scenes such as terrorist events through its relationship with agencies that use crisis actors and special effects to simulate emergency scenarios, injuries, and deaths. The evidence pertaining to terrorist events is rarely heard in court with suspects often being said, as in Manchester, to die in the act, and with investigations being conducted by Public Inquiries.

It has been asked how raking over past traumatic events helps with what we are dealing with now. It might understandably be thought to be a distraction from the major events and consequences of the pantodemic. I have endeavoured to heed this warning in this series of articles. As well as providing the context of past events these articles have highlighted how propaganda, lies, and fakery, were used in the service of the lockdown and fake vaccines. It is hoped that the background information provided in this series might provoke a new level of circumspection in relation to current media output.

One recent story on which we can cast a critical eye is that of CNN's discovery of a prisoner in a Syrian jail. Viewers with intact critical faculties who were described as, “internet sleuths almost immediately began to question the veracity of the report.

People pointed to the cleanliness of the cell (a radical departure from other Syrian prisons), what good condition the man seemed to be in despite the lack of food and water, how quickly his eyes adjusted to the outdoors after being in a windowless cell, the lack of dirt under his nails, and the absence of signs of torture among other red flags.”

If it was not for the questioning of the internet this story would have been registered as real. The question is how many have slipped through the net?

As I discussed in an earlier essay, the killing of George Floyd by a police officer in full public view during lockdown was a highly suspicious event that served to advance the cause of Black Lives Matter and provoke riots that served a real estate acquisition plan. It also sowed racial discord precipitating the destruction of historical sculptures in western countries. The reported murder of Sarah Everard by a policeman in the UK provoked fear and division between the two sexes, and demonstrations that ended with the heavy handed arrest of a photogenic red haired woman in full view of the media. Both events provoked calls to defund the police and distracted from the ongoing lockdown restrictions.

The red haired woman was an actress called Patsy Stevenson who went on to call, “for the Metropolitan police to be abolished.” She told Sky News that women, “can’t trust the police.” Unlike those who demonstrated against lockdowns, Patsy Stevenson and another woman arrested, “received substantial payments from the Met.”

As previously stated, when viewing events presented by the media we must examine them dispassionately like a historian or detective. Who is presenting the information and for what reason? Simon Elmer presents strong evidence that the reported Hamas terrorist attack of October 7^th, 2023 was a false flag event.

Horrific stories of forty babies being beheaded and babies being cooked in an oven by Palestinians were reported by the media. Once they had served their purpose these stories were later shown to be fake, albeit with less fanfare. These fabrications echo lies told about Germans bayonetting babies in Belgium and Iraqis murdering Kuwaiti babies in incubators that were used to engineer consent for participation in World War 1 and the first Iraq war.

The October 7th horror stories were given an individual focus by photogenic female Israeli soldiers who were reported captured. In widely shared footage, Israeli soldier and peace activist Naama Levy, was taken out of the trunk of a vehicle, turned her back to the camera to reveal her bloodied posterior and then re-entered the vehicle she had just exited. If it had been devised as inflammatory propaganda this scene could not have been choreographed any better.

Another woman, tattoo artist Shani Louk, had been attending a festival for peace that was moved from its original venue and closer to the Palestinian border, two days before the attack. Her apparently dead body was shown with the face covered and a leg in an unnatural position.

It was then claimed she was decapitated, though her family reported that she was alive. Seven months later her body was reported to have been found in perfect conditon.

“The body that we have now is complete and beautiful and looks like she’s alive actually,” said Shani’s father, Nissim Louk, telling The Post Friday that the condition of her body was “a miracle.”

Curiously Shani Louk’s last Instagram post included the occult phrase, “as above so below,” and she is pictured making the devil horn hand symbols.

Leo Biddle points out that Shani is a word for ‘Saturn’ in Hinduism, and also means ‘crimson,’ in Hebrew, whilst, ‘Louk,’ means accomplice in English. Shani Louk’s Instagram username ends with three letter k’s, the eleventh letter of the alphabet, totalling 33.

These may be coincidences but the media’s use of apposite names in their storylines has been noted elsewhere by the attentive.

The Mossad formerly operated under the motto, “By way of deception thou shalt make war.”

We have considered Robert Stuart's exposure of apparent fakery in the BBC documentary, ‘Saving Syria's Children,’ which led to the BBC withdrawing the programme from websites and social media. More recently Stuart has asked challenging questions about a witness account from a purported NHS nurse presented by the BBC in relation to the reported Southport stabbings. Unable to find Joanne Niemen registered by the Nursing and Midwifery Council with whom, “all nurses working in the UK must be registered,” Stuart asked the BBC for clarity. Unfortunately the BBC refused to answer Stuart's questions due to the fact that they were submitted a few days outside their 30 day deadline.

The profile of the alleged Southport killer Axel Rudakubana fits a familiar pattern. He was a prodigious actor, known to authorities who, ‘missed chances to stop him,’ and was found to be in possession of an incriminating al-Qaeda terrorist manual. He entered a late guilty plea meaning there is no need for a trial and evidence will not be heard in court.

Freemasonic numbers seem to feature in the story line of the event and Rudakubana’s mugshot seems designed to encourage the view of him as the epitome of evil.

We have to exercise our discernment as to what we are being fed by the media. As our freedom, culture, and standard of living is being eroded it is in our interests to stop being victims of the lie machine that has harmed so many since 2020. Where we are encouraged to react emotionally, our interests are best served by our rationale. In being informed we get to act, not as directed, but as we choose.