Today's journalists are outcome-based political activists who believe, at any cost, the ends justify the means. The role of the media has 'transitioned' from speaking truth to power, protecting the public interest, and providing all facts, evidence, and every side of the story allowing the public to decide to be water-toting narrative providers that tell the people what to think. Opposing viewpoints are censored, and the writer is shunned from polite society. OFCOM is a biased, politically partisan impediment to truth and freedom. Humanity has been purposefully divided by gaslighting, dishonesty, and indoctrination to a point where we now must choose between authoritarianism or liberty and freedom. We must strive to overcome division and seek truth and freedom for all.
I'm afraid I take the view these days that anyone who is talking against the narrative and achieves some sort of reach, which is then maintained over time on the big platforms, must be viewed with extreme scepticism. It's the 'safest' route for me.
Thanks, Francis.
Today's journalists are outcome-based political activists who believe, at any cost, the ends justify the means. The role of the media has 'transitioned' from speaking truth to power, protecting the public interest, and providing all facts, evidence, and every side of the story allowing the public to decide to be water-toting narrative providers that tell the people what to think. Opposing viewpoints are censored, and the writer is shunned from polite society. OFCOM is a biased, politically partisan impediment to truth and freedom. Humanity has been purposefully divided by gaslighting, dishonesty, and indoctrination to a point where we now must choose between authoritarianism or liberty and freedom. We must strive to overcome division and seek truth and freedom for all.
I think that sums it up perfectly. We have to make as many people as possible aware of this.
Nicely done Francis.
I'm afraid I take the view these days that anyone who is talking against the narrative and achieves some sort of reach, which is then maintained over time on the big platforms, must be viewed with extreme scepticism. It's the 'safest' route for me.
Thanks Ian, and yes, that seems to be the logical route.
Very good - thanks for this!
Thanks Steve!