I keep thinking back about the interviews I listened to of Abi and Aisling and their insistance that one shouldn’t call into question so-called victims’ narratives. If they still feel this way after reading these parts 1 - 9, one could almost only conclude the worst.
This brings to mind a comedian's bit regarding the Black Dahlia, a supposed corpse found in LA in the 1940s that was dismembered and staged in the most gruesome manner. The comedian described her wounds and incisions, breasts removed, and a cross-kike posture of the corpse. All of that aside, he said, "What could she possibly have said to make a guy that mad?"
OK, there was no Black Dahlia, it was a psyop, which is why it was never "solved". Close examination of the corpse reveals a dummy, not even lifelike with a face pasted on in the darkroom, It's just clumsy staging and darkroom work that in part caught on because regular people cannot bear to examine a mutilated corpse.
And my goodness, if the 9/11-guy is welcome to keep posting, then so are you!
Before Covid, I wouldn’t have scrutinised gruesome pics but since then I have learned to ask Why this? Why now? because maybe for such graphic pics to have been released, it could only have been a dummy.
I think I read your piece on it before and agree many people claim to not be able to look (objectively) at scenes of a graphic nature when they are told they are real, yet many of those same people can watch far more graphic horror movies or porn. The endless contradictions of Normies. Anyway, nice articles both.
I’ve just spotted a good account on substack called Pighooey. Some very detailed research that you might be interested in.
Thank you, Shouty.
My pleasure!
Nothing you won’t know already but nicely presented and accords with your own amazingly detailed work x
I keep thinking back about the interviews I listened to of Abi and Aisling and their insistance that one shouldn’t call into question so-called victims’ narratives. If they still feel this way after reading these parts 1 - 9, one could almost only conclude the worst.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement?
What happens if you ask TRUTH questions?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/questions-for-the-911-truther-talking
This brings to mind a comedian's bit regarding the Black Dahlia, a supposed corpse found in LA in the 1940s that was dismembered and staged in the most gruesome manner. The comedian described her wounds and incisions, breasts removed, and a cross-kike posture of the corpse. All of that aside, he said, "What could she possibly have said to make a guy that mad?"
OK, there was no Black Dahlia, it was a psyop, which is why it was never "solved". Close examination of the corpse reveals a dummy, not even lifelike with a face pasted on in the darkroom, It's just clumsy staging and darkroom work that in part caught on because regular people cannot bear to examine a mutilated corpse.
Sorry to promote, and delete comment if that is not kosher: https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/01/10/black-dahlia/
And my goodness, if the 9/11-guy is welcome to keep posting, then so are you!
Before Covid, I wouldn’t have scrutinised gruesome pics but since then I have learned to ask Why this? Why now? because maybe for such graphic pics to have been released, it could only have been a dummy.
I think I read your piece on it before and agree many people claim to not be able to look (objectively) at scenes of a graphic nature when they are told they are real, yet many of those same people can watch far more graphic horror movies or porn. The endless contradictions of Normies. Anyway, nice articles both.
No, feel free. The comments are open so I can learn and the internet relies on links.