Hi Francis, we've got a serious problem on this side of the fence that a worrying number of critical thinkers are falling for counterintelligence juicy clues thinking they're clever but walking straight into the trap - like the no bomb, no victims conclusion put out there by Richard D Hall that so many repeated and still defend even though there's zero evidence to support the theory. The victims are real. As you know I've looked at the Manchester story forensically and found the false flag investigation to be seriously misleading, deliberately throwing readers off the scent. How could anybody of sound moral judgement find this kind of picking apart of victim statements to be ok? It's plain wrong. https://open.substack.com/pub/aislingoloughlin/p/evil-richard-d-hall-and-genevieve?r=1p5pzt&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Your article jogged a memory. In 2000 I had a two week training in Parsburg Germany. It was a "Tank base" as I recall it being described. We were there as members of the US Army National Guard from the state of Louisiana and being a construction unit, we paved and built and repaired structures etc... I think of it as a military version of a short study abroad program. While we were there, the base was also occupied by a large number of European civilian actors who were paid to populate makeshift villages in order to simulate war time (we were told). We were instructed not to speak to them and they did not speak to us. I remember seeing them eat in large groups in the "Chow-Hall". They were men women and some older children perhaps...Some with injuries which I assume were fake. It was surreal. The idea that these people were making their living this way seemed to suggest something of their lack of economic opportunity but a little asking around and I began to hear that they were very well paid. I have not looked into this at all. It may be very common. Just thought I'd share in case it inspired your interest. Cheers!
Thank you, that is interesting. Did you assume the injuries were fake at the time and what made you think that? As we have seen in these articles they employ amputee actors among others.
I remember being conflicted about the injuries. That might be because of how convincing they appeared to be. I don't recall the sight of blood or bandages so it feels likely that I am remembering crutches and the like. perhaps amputees? The closest i got to these and my observations of injuries would have been when they were on a lunch break in the dinning hall at the same time as we soldiers which might have been only once when we first arrived. The army had a name for these actors... i wish i could remember. The overwhelming feeling i had was pity. As a part time soldier "playing war" was something i felt a bit silly and conflicted about as a twenty year old. Then encountering these civilians "playing victim"... in earnest and for money, it was just too strange for me. yes. in the context of my own struggles with the reality of military life... the banality of its mechanisms...its inability to recognize individual aptitude or talent... consigned to being an armed pawn in a rich mans game, seeing them, i was made to ponder the role of innocent victim in that same game. Wasteful. Sad. Surreal.
Excellent writing and clear thinking analysis. I rarely comment on the minutiae of psyops/false flags anymore (there are always plenty of dead giveaways – their rules) but this issue is a stumbling block for many who still have one foot in consensus/msm reality. Look forward to the next installments and this series should be required reading for anyone that has recently gone down the rabbit hole. Btw most smaller psyops/false flags can easily be carried out with just a handful of local lodge members.
I would urge anyone delving into the realms of the capabilities of the intelligence services, crisis actors or villages of intelligence operatives to read Dead Lions by Mick Herron. Yes it is fiction but anyone researching declassified material will know that the intelligence services have all manner of tactics and personnel at their disposal.
Abi likes to keep one foot in reality and focus on what is good, true and beautiful. That is to be commended; one of her sayings is “is it possible?..... yes, is it likely? Probably not” and yet also acknowledges the military grade propaganda we were subjected to in 2020.
I could talk about this stuff all day. It’s fascinating although extremely annoying to realise I have duped many times over.
I think Abi's position is a reasonable one and her questions are fair, which is why I addressed them. Awareness of the extent of the deception may have helped more people to see through the lies we were told in 2020. It may also help people to recognise the lies we are being told now. We've all been duped many times.
Absolutely reasonable. And the same goes for Aisling, it is right that we continuously challenge our assumptions, although as an average member of the public with only access to the official narrative we are often stumbling around in the dark with our hands tied behind our backs. As usual, you light up the darkness and enable us to see more clearly.
A top notch account. An extension to this is routine participation of regional police forces in media-fuelled deceptions. Dancing nurses or crisis actors in false flag hoaxes are one thing as a certain type of citizen. Each to one's own. However, Crown servants 'for hire' role playing, and funded by the public is something else.
My 'specialism' since getting very much involved and blogging these last 18+ months is in river-themed hoax missing person events. I wouldn't lay claim to much, other than being the sole person to have documented with irrefutable details the performance around Nicola Bulley. A few more since then - all of which are proactively managed by police, albeit directed by others. To get to the root of understanding to what we might refer to collectively as 'crisis actors' involved in whichever hoax, remains work in progress.
I do find myself analysing the actions of the Police at these major incidents. Didn’t the senior police officer in charge of the NB investigation die shortly after?
Then the retired officer in charge of the actions of Lancashire Police is head of the College of Policing, Sir Andy Marsh. He was recently in the news regarding the new non-crime hate incidents and was previously involved in the Angiolini report regarding Sarah Everard and the Bristol race riots.
Yes, ACC Peter Lawson Lancs Police died age 50 (possibly stress-induced given the circumstances). While Sir Andy Marsh is CEO of College of Policing, the fraudulent 141-page report was conveniently handed off to freelance Dr Iain Raphael at the time of publication Nov'23. Unfortunately for them they couldn't mention any part of the final big day as every last aspect had been shown to be a scripted set piece. Crown servants and mainstream media caught out with their supporting actors.
Hi Francis, we've got a serious problem on this side of the fence that a worrying number of critical thinkers are falling for counterintelligence juicy clues thinking they're clever but walking straight into the trap - like the no bomb, no victims conclusion put out there by Richard D Hall that so many repeated and still defend even though there's zero evidence to support the theory. The victims are real. As you know I've looked at the Manchester story forensically and found the false flag investigation to be seriously misleading, deliberately throwing readers off the scent. How could anybody of sound moral judgement find this kind of picking apart of victim statements to be ok? It's plain wrong. https://open.substack.com/pub/aislingoloughlin/p/evil-richard-d-hall-and-genevieve?r=1p5pzt&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Thanks Aisling, I am aware of this footage. I have addressed it and the points raised by both sides in this series of articles.
Hi Francis,
Your article jogged a memory. In 2000 I had a two week training in Parsburg Germany. It was a "Tank base" as I recall it being described. We were there as members of the US Army National Guard from the state of Louisiana and being a construction unit, we paved and built and repaired structures etc... I think of it as a military version of a short study abroad program. While we were there, the base was also occupied by a large number of European civilian actors who were paid to populate makeshift villages in order to simulate war time (we were told). We were instructed not to speak to them and they did not speak to us. I remember seeing them eat in large groups in the "Chow-Hall". They were men women and some older children perhaps...Some with injuries which I assume were fake. It was surreal. The idea that these people were making their living this way seemed to suggest something of their lack of economic opportunity but a little asking around and I began to hear that they were very well paid. I have not looked into this at all. It may be very common. Just thought I'd share in case it inspired your interest. Cheers!
Thank you, that is interesting. Did you assume the injuries were fake at the time and what made you think that? As we have seen in these articles they employ amputee actors among others.
I remember being conflicted about the injuries. That might be because of how convincing they appeared to be. I don't recall the sight of blood or bandages so it feels likely that I am remembering crutches and the like. perhaps amputees? The closest i got to these and my observations of injuries would have been when they were on a lunch break in the dinning hall at the same time as we soldiers which might have been only once when we first arrived. The army had a name for these actors... i wish i could remember. The overwhelming feeling i had was pity. As a part time soldier "playing war" was something i felt a bit silly and conflicted about as a twenty year old. Then encountering these civilians "playing victim"... in earnest and for money, it was just too strange for me. yes. in the context of my own struggles with the reality of military life... the banality of its mechanisms...its inability to recognize individual aptitude or talent... consigned to being an armed pawn in a rich mans game, seeing them, i was made to ponder the role of innocent victim in that same game. Wasteful. Sad. Surreal.
Excellent writing and clear thinking analysis. I rarely comment on the minutiae of psyops/false flags anymore (there are always plenty of dead giveaways – their rules) but this issue is a stumbling block for many who still have one foot in consensus/msm reality. Look forward to the next installments and this series should be required reading for anyone that has recently gone down the rabbit hole. Btw most smaller psyops/false flags can easily be carried out with just a handful of local lodge members.
Thank you, Mike.
I would urge anyone delving into the realms of the capabilities of the intelligence services, crisis actors or villages of intelligence operatives to read Dead Lions by Mick Herron. Yes it is fiction but anyone researching declassified material will know that the intelligence services have all manner of tactics and personnel at their disposal.
Abi likes to keep one foot in reality and focus on what is good, true and beautiful. That is to be commended; one of her sayings is “is it possible?..... yes, is it likely? Probably not” and yet also acknowledges the military grade propaganda we were subjected to in 2020.
I could talk about this stuff all day. It’s fascinating although extremely annoying to realise I have duped many times over.
I think Abi's position is a reasonable one and her questions are fair, which is why I addressed them. Awareness of the extent of the deception may have helped more people to see through the lies we were told in 2020. It may also help people to recognise the lies we are being told now. We've all been duped many times.
Absolutely reasonable. And the same goes for Aisling, it is right that we continuously challenge our assumptions, although as an average member of the public with only access to the official narrative we are often stumbling around in the dark with our hands tied behind our backs. As usual, you light up the darkness and enable us to see more clearly.
Thank you, Shouty. I hope everyone reading these articles takes them that way.
Well.... maybe not ‘the poor’. They’d rather you didn’t say anything at all 😂
*been duped
I’m re-posting Good writing.
Thank you.
A top notch account. An extension to this is routine participation of regional police forces in media-fuelled deceptions. Dancing nurses or crisis actors in false flag hoaxes are one thing as a certain type of citizen. Each to one's own. However, Crown servants 'for hire' role playing, and funded by the public is something else.
Thank you, Chris. What kind of incidents are you thinking of that involve police?
My 'specialism' since getting very much involved and blogging these last 18+ months is in river-themed hoax missing person events. I wouldn't lay claim to much, other than being the sole person to have documented with irrefutable details the performance around Nicola Bulley. A few more since then - all of which are proactively managed by police, albeit directed by others. To get to the root of understanding to what we might refer to collectively as 'crisis actors' involved in whichever hoax, remains work in progress.
I find this very interesting too.
I do find myself analysing the actions of the Police at these major incidents. Didn’t the senior police officer in charge of the NB investigation die shortly after?
Then the retired officer in charge of the actions of Lancashire Police is head of the College of Policing, Sir Andy Marsh. He was recently in the news regarding the new non-crime hate incidents and was previously involved in the Angiolini report regarding Sarah Everard and the Bristol race riots.
Probably nothing.
Yes, ACC Peter Lawson Lancs Police died age 50 (possibly stress-induced given the circumstances). While Sir Andy Marsh is CEO of College of Policing, the fraudulent 141-page report was conveniently handed off to freelance Dr Iain Raphael at the time of publication Nov'23. Unfortunately for them they couldn't mention any part of the final big day as every last aspect had been shown to be a scripted set piece. Crown servants and mainstream media caught out with their supporting actors.
With so many visuals, it's a watching episode, not a listening one. It's long but worth it.
9/11 revisionism and why evidence matters
Podcast: https://www.jermwarfare.social/p/911-revisionism-evidence