Predictive Programming Part 1

Mass hypnosis

When we become aware of outrageous state crimes scales fall from our eyes. We start to recognise that the reality presented to us by the state news media complex is limited and false. There is more to learn beyond such curated limits. We find that there are realities which we have been conditioned to disregard that we must now consider.

After 9/11, inquiring minds noticed that the events of that day had been prefigured in popular culture; in television, film, music, and advertising. Notable examples were shared on the then less censored internet. So numerous were they that one compilation of clips and images lasts more than hour. Another fills a book of 198 pages.

Coincidence theorists will dismiss these as the products of imaginative screenwriters, playwrights, advertisers, and animators. Any conceived attack on the United States might be expected to include iconic landmarks and planes. Strangely, those tasked with actually considering such a thing were afflicted with a failure of the required imagination. “Nobody in our government at least could envision flying airplanes into buildings,” George W Bush intoned, in a statement that was echoed by others in his administration -despite numerous military drills preparing for that exact eventuality.

Among dissidents, clips and images that foreshadow the events of 9/11 (or other state crimes) have come to be seen as what is termed,“predictive programming,” the deliberate priming of the public mind. Yet for such programming to exist, the events of 9/11 would have to have been known in advance. As I have shown in previous essays, foreknowledge of the events of 9/11 is evident from reports made by the media, politicians, and the so-called “dancing Israelis,” of Mossad. It is also evident from “irrefutable proof of insider trading,” prior to 9/11. “The extent of the 9/11-related informed trading was unprecedented…covering the entire world from Japan to the US to North America to Europe.” Advanced knowledge is clear from the sending and receipt of warning text messages and it is suggested by the numerous high profile people who changed their intended plans to avoid the flights or buildings involved that day. (It is also possible that stories attaching high profile figures to the events were designed to heighten emotional impact as we have seen with terrorist attacks associated with popstars).

These examples demonstrate foreknowledge in the hours or days before the attacks but earlier still on 28^th June 2001, former US Naval Intelligence Officer Bill Cooper warned his radio audience of a forthcoming attack adding, “whatever is going to happen that they are going to blame on Osama Bin Laden don't you even believe it!”

At a concert in Utrecht, Netherlands, on December 23, 1998 popstar Prince sang,
“…..I got to get ready for the bomb,
Osama bin Laden, get ready to bomb,
America you’d better watch out,
2001 hit me.” Prince later warned of chemtrails and cautioned, “don’t let the computer use you,” adding that there was “a war going on, the battlefield is in the mind and the prize is the soul. So be careful.”

It is clear that an event such as 9/11 had to be prepared long in advance and that in some quarters there was foreknowledge that exceeded informed speculation. Could this have manifested in tv, film, music and advertising?

In their book ‘Hidden History: The Secret Origins of World War I,’ authors Gerry Docherty and Jim MacGregor document how the minds of the British people were cultivated by placing propaganda articles in the press which vilified Germany, and by commissioning novels which encouraged the idea of a German invasion of Britain. “The literary war began in earnest in 1903 with the publication of Erskine Childers’ bestselling novel The Riddle of the Sands.”

This was followed by a book which was commissioned in 1906 and published in 1910. ‘The Invasion,’ “was translated into 27 languages and sold over a million copies,” and spawned successful copycat books on the same theme.

“A large and influential section of the British press was working to the rabid agenda of the Secret Elite in poisoning the minds of a whole nation. It was part of a propaganda drive that was sustained right up to, and throughout, the First World War.

By targeting Germany as the font of evil, the hate and the irrational spy and invasion stories gave the Northcliffe stables rich material to boost circulation and promote the war to which the Secret Elite were committed.”

If the state was using insidious propaganda in this way in the early 1900s, is it possible that such methods might be in use today?

In March 2001, X-Files spin-off The Lone Gunmen featured the storyline of a government plot to use remote control to hijack a commercial airliner from Boston and fly it into the World Trade Center in order to provoke a profitable new war. The title the Lone Gunmen appears to be a reference to the numerous patsies accused of assassinations where the notion of a state conspiracy is discounted or ridiculed.

In the 1996 movie, Long Kiss Goodnight, the 1993 world trade center bombing is declared as a false flag attack. A character named Perkins explains of his future plot, “I have no idea how to fake killing 4,000 people, so we’re just going to have to do it for real, blame it on the Muslims, naturally. Then I get my funding.”

There were many similar examples of predictive programming that included plotlines, images of the towers being destroyed or attacked by planes, and time pieces in film and photographs indicating the numbers 9 and 11. We have already encountered the passport of the character Neo in the 1999 movie the Matrix showing the date of expiry as September 11th, 2001.

But why?

If we accept that there was foreknowledge and that propaganda is used to ‘poison’ our minds then we can accept the possibility that predictive programming exists. As in the case of World War 1, its practical function may be to manipulate our perceptions to consider a certain country or religion as an enemy so as to engineer consent for murderous military operations. We have also previously considered the process of Revelation of the Method in which the inititated joke at a level that is not understood by the innocent and the ingenu. Such revelation was originally thought to follow an event in order to gradually reveal the nature of a crime and in so doing, to humiliate the public in their powerlessness or inaction.

Predictive programming obviously occurs in advance of an incident and whilst it too reveals the nature of a crime and engages in ritual mockery it can also serve a practical function. In the manner of a voodoo curse or a doctor's diagnosis that declares the victim to have only six months to live, the prediction itself encourages the perception that the occurrence is part of an acceptable or even an inevitable turn of events, instead of being highly unlikely or even impossible. Predictive programming utilises the power of suggestion.

We all saw the extent of the propaganda machine during the scamdemic. We saw how corporate chains had stickers and stencils speedily applied to floors and doors and windows, and perspex screens installed. We saw how readily people behaved in the manner that corporate movies such as Contagion (2011) and Outbreak (1995) had suggested was appropriate for the alleged health threat advertised by corporate media and corporation owned governments. The corporate world worked in unison to harness the apparatus of public life in jarring concert. These outlets for propaganda existed before and after the scamdemic. What if they are always in operation, but less obviously?

A clip from the 2008 movie The Dark Knight Rises shows Batman advising a character called Blake to wear a mask. Blake refuses saying he is not scared to be seen but Batman advises him, “The mask is not for you. It’s to protect the people you care about.” He then hands Blake a small grenade in the now familiar (but imagined) shape of the fake virus.

Before we consider that at least one generation has been injected with ingredients as unnecessary and repugnant as human embryonic foetal cells, the behaviour of people in response to the scamdemic indicates that it is possible that insidious propaganda alone could be responsible for the confusion of young people over their sex, their sexual orientation and their comfort in their skin. We can all see the obvious extent of the state propaganda for some agendas.

It has been clear how the rainbow has been appropriated to further the trans agenda. As I wrote previously, during lockdown children in the UK were encouraged to depict rainbows and display them in windows. The children were to regard the rainbow as a symbol of the hope and salvation offered by the beatific health service from the propaganda plague. Simultaneously, rainbow flags advancing the trans agenda were being hoisted over the colleges of Oxford University like the standard of a conquering army, in the ongoing ideological conquest of academia. The rainbow then commanded positions on townhalls, ambulances, roads, pedestrian crossings, trains, mobility buggies in train stations, and even postage vans. The Ukraine flag became similarly ubiquitous. More subtly, in advertising, homosexual couples increasingly replace heterosexual. Traffic lights, changed supposedly temporarily for those who find pride in their sexual inclinations and body dysmorphia, remain permanently altered.

The Net Zero agenda is pushed overtly by propaganda slogans printed on the delivery vans of corporate supermarkets and on council banners. As for the trans agenda, there is a climate change propaganda train. In popular culture Net Zero goals are seeded to the public in television series such as Flat Share in which strangers rent and live together. Movies portraying plane crashes sow a seed of fear in association with air travel, a reduction in which is in line with Net Zero targets. We are told that we are, “Renting, as it should be.”

The communitarian goals of Net Zero that are intended to dissolve the rights of the individual, are served by the notion of society pulling together for the greater good. The required sacrifices have to be presented as being for the greater good because they are only to the detriment of the individual. Those who do not pull together in the prescribed direction are de facto enemies of the herd. ‘Together’ was a word associated with the sacrifices of lockdown, the controlled resistance to it, and is forwarded by charities patronised by the lockdown breaching, jab-pushing royals, whose king launched the Great Reset. The word is crow-barred into the advertising for movies such as Spiderman and even into advertisements for make-up.

The WEF’s Great Reset promised a ‘new normal,’ and the coronation of Charles delivered a new reign. London's Evening Standard repeatedly informs its readers we are entering a Brave New World, as Hollywood delivers a film of the same name. Ballet and opera promise us that New Worlds Await and a book announces A New Reign Begins.

In reality surveillance increases. People accept scans, pat downs and searches to enter municipal buildings, nightclubs, galleries, and sports grounds. Advertisers encourage us to disappear into our phones, and champion the fake reality of the metaverse.

The output of advertisers becomes indistinguishable from the satire of cautionary memes.

The state instructs us variously to be kind, cautious, and careful - laughable directives after using lockdown to turn people on one another and towards poisonous injections. These posters encourage fear of the environment, of each other, normalise the micro-managing of behaviour, and demonise social interaction and individuality. People are instructed to report on one another.

Propaganda works on the subconscious mind. Our opinions and thoughts are moulded by men we have never met whose names we do not know. The effect of this subconscious programming is demonstrated by a trick performed by hypnotist Derren Brown on an unwitting subject (perhaps coincidentally) named, Christian. Christian is asked to think of a song of his choice which Brown then guesses correctly, but Christian is not aware that he has been subjected to suggestive programming with the song having been subtly played and whistled around him earlier in the day by people planted by Brown.

The victim of predictive programming believes themselves to be thinking independently but they produce thoughts and behaviours intended by the hypnotist.

Part 2 is here:

A related interview is here.

Thank you for reading. You can help me to write more frequently by

1. Subscribing monthly here on substack

2. Making a one-off contribution via BuyMeaCoffee

3. Contributing in either way via bank transfer to Santander, account number 00758982, sort code 09-01-36, account name F X ONeill (please use your email address as a reference if you’d like me to acknowledge receipt).

Your support enables me to write these articles and is very much appreciated. Thank you.