Lockdown, Vaccines, and the Occult 2

Part 2: Brainwashing and Rituals

During lockdown the techniques used on the public by government behavioural scientists aligned with those of brainwashing.

The first tactic utilised in brainwashing is the isolation of the victim. This is followed by an attack on self-esteem which in lockdown involved making people think of themselves as carriers of disease and potential 'granny killers.' Further tactics include mental and physical abuse. These were inflicted on those who were locked at home, avoided, starved of physical contact, and compelled to cover their faces. Another tool is peer pressure which clearly manifested in 2020 in the shouting down and censorship of questions, neighbourhood clapping rituals, and masking. Brainwashing involves instilling an ‘us vs them’ mentality such as was engendered in those who policed or reported on their neighbours behaviour. It also entails occasional 'love bombing' which we saw in communities applauding health care workers, online concerts, choirs, singalongs and similar activities, as well as unifying occasions such as officially sanctioned protests.

The first five of these brainwashing techniques happen to coincide with those employed by the voices that are heard by what modern medicine terms schizophrenics. These have been studied by psychotherapist Jerry Marzinsky and clinical psychologist Wilson van Dusen who have learned to view the voices as entities separate from the individual who hears them. Van Dusen observes parallels with what are described by eighteeth century nobleman and scientist Emmanuel Swedenborg as demons.

Initially the voices can seem helpful before encouraging the sufferer to isolate from family and friends. Isolation is instrumental in worsening the condition. The voices engage in repetitive mantras, are consistently negative, and verbally degrade the victim. From March 2020 onwards the public were constantly subjected to slogans such as ‘Stay home, stay safe,’ ‘Stay alert, control the virus, save lives,’ and ‘hands, face, space.’

The voices encourage humiliating acts, for which they penalise non-compliance and ridicule obedience. During lockdown people were asked to adhere to a bewildering variety of contradictory and nonsensical observances that included curfews, and permission to unmask or to gather only when performing certain activities or at certain locations.

As schizophrenic symptoms increase in severity the voices can take a physical hold of the sufferer beginning with individual parts of the body (such as the ear or the eye, causing deafness or visibly altering the eye's alignment) -in a parallel with the masking (of part of the face, an external body part) that preceded vaccination (that invaded and affected the whole body). The voices encourage paranoia and an adversarial view of society. They are quietened by positive thought, prayer and religious engagement, being particularly opposed to attendance at church, the last of which was stopped during lockdown. The voices also seem to particularly dislike children -who were severely affected by lockdown and for whom it was especially cruel.

Interestingly for those isolated during lockdown, social media provided another simulacram of the schizophrenic experience or demonic attack, with the individual who opposed the calculated psychological manipulation facing attacks by a multitude of voices that included friends and family, bots and sometimes a literal army. Inevitably, isolation increased people’s internet usage.

During the lockdown, rituals were employed to initiate people into the 'new normal.' The ritual of applauding health care workers with the banging of pots and pans was observed all over the world. In the UK this supposedly organic demonstration began under the title 'clap for carers' on March 26^th 2020, the day the Lockdown Regulations came into effect. In rituals clapping and drumming are ways of summoning occult powers.

Also in the UK, children were encouraged to paint rainbows and place them in their windows. During the lockdown these colourful communications from incarcerated children were as prevalent as decorations at Christmas and marked houses that hoped that the spectre of death might pass over their homes.

“In Babylonian literature the rainbow was “a sign of wrath, of terror, and of ill, and as an attribute of the goddess Tir-an-na, bringer of misfortune.”

One Christian author explains: “In the occult, the rainbow is a hypnotic device supposedly forming a bridge between the individual and the over-soul or Great Universal Mind. This ‘Mind’ is not God.” ”

For children in 2020 the rainbow was superficially associated with salvation by the beatific NHS. The rainbow has also been appropriated by the tiny but state-backed transgender minority and featured in flags flown in and over municipal buildings. The Bible relates that after the flood sent by God to cleanse the earth because it “was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth,” he made the rainbow the symbol that he would never again send such a flood to destroy man.

In Masonic symbolism, we find that the Rainbow appears as the representation of Lucifer, the Light Bearer.

As the then Prince Charles was head of the organisation (WEF) that sought to utilise lockdowns as an “unprecedented opportunity to rethink and reset the ways in which we live,” the rainbow's association with freemasonry may not be incidental.

Freemasonry is a secret society that uses elaborate rituals and symbolism. The Queen's cousin Duke Edward of Kent is “the most senior freemason in the hierarchy,” “having been the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge for 55 years.” As I have pointed out, his brother Michael is also a high ranking mason as was the queen's husband Philip. Philip is notable for his remark that, “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.” This is often dismissed as joke but he was obviously concerned with reducing the population.

This concern with depopulation was shared by Club of Rome member and WEF alumnus Dennis L Meadows who hoped “that it can occur in a civil way and I mean civil in a special way. Peaceful," and “in a way that is relatively equal so that people share the experience."

Commentators now observe that “everything from the announcement of a pandemic to the lockdown to the masks, the testing, all of that was designed and orchestrated and perfectly timed just to ensure that as many people in the world as possible got injected with that drug. That was what this was all about... that was the whole point of everything.”

As I wrote here about the supposedly apolitical royals' unified and public stance in coercing people to take vaccinations:

The royals also strikingly stepped out of apolitical line when they pushed the covid shots on the unsuspecting public. Did a family that does not travel together due to the risk to the royal lineage all roll up their sleeves for mRNA shots for which prior research has always precluded human usage?

It is also notable that

The queen rewarded the chief protagonists in the covid fiasco with honours.

Thank you for reading.

Please like, share and subscribe.

Part 3 is here.