35 Comments
deletedMar 9Liked by Francis O'Neill
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

The fact such movies were made at all is instructive. If you have any further insights into his prison life I'd be interested to hear them.

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Francis O'Neill

Interesting Francis x

Expand full comment
author

Thank you Jules x

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Francis O'Neill

REALLY interesting article. 9/11 should indeed be the litmus test. It is my belief that this cataclysmic event gave those in power the green light to go ahead with whatever agenda they wished. If they could pull that off - and they did to a large extent, because so many people believed the narrative - then they could get away with anything. Covid was another example of getting away with anything. Anyone with any ounce of intelligence should have been able to see through the lies, but so many people just fell for it.......and sadly, I think they will fall for the next assault on humanity that will no doubt be presented to us soon. Assange is widely lauded as the hero of free speech and yet - and I'm hugely grateful to Francis for pointing this out - he's clearly not the person most people in the 'freedom movement' think he is. Great article.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, Laura.

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Francis O'Neill

Richard D Hall did some fantastic work exposing all sorts of hideous

State cover ups. And in particular, [and also one of my favourites] a fairly

brilliant expose of the 'Assange bollocks': that supposedly passed for an

infringement of "our freedom of expression". Richard [richplanet..] is now being

chewed up - and spat out by the establishment. Christ; you've got to wonder

which institutions, haven't been captured by these vile scum: NHS, Judiciary,

Puppeticians, media, Medical-Pharmaceutical et al .... And, more disturbingly,

some members of the 'Truth movement' - 'Health freedom' -'Alt-Media etc.

who purport to be ''resistance'': but who're actually just part of the fucking

Vichy regime, causing even more mayhem.!1!!

Great piece, Francis.

Keep up the good work, buddy ... !!!

Expand full comment
founding

Richard's an absolute legend

Expand full comment

Yes he is, and gets a hell of a lot closer to 911 truth than AE911, KEVIN Ryan or Richard Gage.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Dean, I cited Richard's Assange series with a link towards the end of my article. I had arrived at a similar view on Assange after seeing his comments on 9/11.

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Francis O'Neill

The email summary around the funding of wiki leaks is fascinating. The people mentioned are key to some interesting events, specifically to cryptography and the creation of Bitcoin.

The creation of the genesis block follows and the message encoded within that refers to UK banking and a second bank bailout.

It’s all too coincidental, too convenient to not be connected.

The litmus test is very important as it exposes the ‘look here not over there’ tactics.

Keep unearthing the plain truth Francis.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks ShoutyMum, that's it -the misdirection of people's attention is key.

Expand full comment

Where can I read more about the genesis of Bitcoin? I think Bitcoin is a means to deflect from other monetary systems which would serve the prosperity and independence of humanity more, like Giselle's system, well tested in the town Wörgel of Austria.

Expand full comment

I haven’t heard of that system, I’ll look it up. I wonder if it’s like the Bradbury pound.

You can just search up the genesis block online. There are some articles that link to the exact front page of The Times referencing the bailout, weirdly there is also an article about Israel invading Gaza on the same page.

I hear people rave about Bitcoin but why would anyone invest in a product without knowing who created it? I don’t understand. It’s also very easily traceable, perfect for the taxman and finite. Crypto markets are just as easily manipulated as the metal price or Fiat currency.

Expand full comment

I don' t think it is like Bradbury pound, best start to learn about this monetary experiment during the depression is an article in German, but automatic translations are easy:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%B6rgler_Schwundgeld

Today, small communities could use https://gradido.net/en/ for accounting their transactions. It works digital but is totally different from crypto coins. Not easy for our mind to understand that such a "system of dwindling money" could work as we are grown up and used to debt based fiat currencies for generations. Also "limited money" tied to a goldstandard or like Bitcoin will not cause a prosperous society as the few will own allmost all of it and for the many is nothing left to do their transactions. And that is the most important part for money: it has to flow freely like blood in order to spend life for all. The monetary system is the ring that binds us to the powers that be.

Expand full comment

So being infinite would be a sounder store of value? Traceable, how, in that you can trace it back to a coded address?

Perfect for which taxman? It knows no boundaries.

If the establishment created Bitcoin, it was the greatest own goal in history.

Expand full comment

You seem a bit defensive over Bitcoin.

If it works for you, crack on 👍

Expand full comment
Mar 8Liked by Francis O'Neill

No question about it. If you cant be honest abt the blatant facts surrounding the watershed event of your own time (until the scamdemic came along anyway) what does that say about you as a truth-teller or journalist? And even in the independent media most dont talk about 9/11 Truth. Yet they all know the 9/11-anthrax attack were a false flag attack. That's what disturbs me the most [the ones who know and still say say nothing) and why I appreciate people continuing to speak out on this issue.

Expand full comment
founding
Mar 8Liked by Francis O'Neill

Always refreshing when you see some lights on and someone's actually home for a change!

Well done.

Expand full comment

This is great stuff.

Related, no one knows who Cate Jenkins is.

AE911 doesn't talk about buildings 4, 5 or 6 which also were destroyed, or any evidence that doesn't support controlled demo. Why is that?

Expand full comment
Mar 9Liked by Francis O'Neill

I'm keeping it simple: hard to believe anything I 🙈, 🙉 or they 🙊

Expand full comment

Just to point out that psyops are all about mind control using magician's tricks, not doing things for real unless they're wanted.

So the question should be asked: what did they want for real on 9/11 and what did they only want us to believe?

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911

Expand full comment

Check out Qortal! https://qortal.org/

Unhackable infrastructure for a decentralized, censorship-free Internet…a decentralized 'operating system' where virtually any project/application can be built securely. No middlemen of any kind, no servers, no DNS. Data stored on the decentralized/distributed/encrypted/chunked Qortal Data Network (QDN), Qortal will bring back individual sovereignty to a worldwide economy.

Expand full comment

Considering that 911 is almost a quarter-century old, and that the majority of polled Americans consistently express disbelief in the official narrative, I wonder why we're so concerned with the credibility of brand-name whistleblowers. I'm old enough to remember when the Pentagon papers came out. People made some noise then resumed slaving for pharaoh.

One might say that arguing who is the REAL credible alt-news service is itself a distraction from dealing with and confronting the countless evils committed by institutions of power. But distraction does keep us occupied. Look at me, tasking time to comment on something that I can do nothing about.

Expand full comment
author

The truth helps us to better navigate the world. Assange has been in the news recently. There are people who are still taken with his story so the lessons of the 9/11 Truth Movement become useful in informing a new wave of people.

Expand full comment

I understand the concept of publishing being a form of information aimed at large numbers of people. Something called media, I'm told.

Expand full comment
author

When we are intent on missing the point we tend to do so.

Expand full comment

I get the point; I assert that it is pointless. What it devolves into are dueling pundits, with substack as currently prevailing example of this, providing an auditorium for gladiator oracles: "Whose is the skinniest skinny?"

And then, of course, there are the ever popular petty ego kerfluffles, as you and I are currently demonstrating. The incessant human need for distraction especially if it addresses a worthy cause. It can be fun, and indeed informative, but infowars are imo just like all other wars: sucker games to keep us proles distracted from living our lives as we will, the one thing that the global blobster deep state ickies can't control.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhhOcicVNgM

If this life is driving, you too drink

You sit around a-wondering just what to think

Well, I got some conciliation

I'll give it to you if I might

You know, I don't worry 'bout a thing

'Cause I know nothing's gonna be alright

You know this world is just a one big trouble spot

'Cause some have plenty and some have not

You know I used to be troubled, but I finally saw the light

Now I don't worry 'bout a thing

'Cause I know nothing's gonna be alright

Don't waste your time trying to be a go getter

Things will get worse before they get any better

You know there's always somebody playing with dynamite

But I don't worry 'bout a thing

'Cause I know nothing's going to be alright

Expand full comment

The essential element of 9/11 that is so little understood is that a False Dilemma propaganda strategy was used.

Those in power have us profiled into two main groups: ~90% believers / ~10% disbelievers. For the smaller psyops generally they simply target the 90% and expect 10% disbelief (which by definition doesn't include anyone at all of high status or at least anyone of high status willing to speak out), a situation that means the narrative isn't threatened.

In the big psyops, however, they push out one stream for the 90% and another for the 10% (broken into conflicting substreams) in order that everyone gets it wrong.

However - whatever streams - underneath the multiple layers of propaganda dust they tell us the truth. They have a rule known as Revelation of the Method which is ALWAYS obeyed. Ironically, though, it actually works better for them to tell us the truth in this way. It's such a strange phenomenon but it actually works better.

https://soundofheart.org/galacticfreepress/content/revelation-method-predictive-programming-and-prime-directive

For 9/11 there were two stories:

Story A (90%) - Terrrorrrrists

Story B (10%) - US Government and its collaborators

Reality C: US government was responsible, however, the event isn't as depicted. It was really a demolition job (where the normal protocols of full evacuation were followed) and the airliner crashes were faked, cloaked in a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terror Exercise cloaked further in a terrorist attack. So simple really.

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911-the-false-dilemma-propaganda

Expand full comment

Two curious comments by Stella Assange in her 'impromptu' speech at the Censorship Industrial Complex event hosted by Russell Brand: https://rumble.com/v2xtsg8-exposing-the-censorship-industrial-complex-part-2-159-stay-free-with-russel.html

============

34m18s

"The High Court of England has made the completely inexplicable decision to not even allow him to appeal to the High Court. He made an application to appeal in September 2022 and it took a single judge 10 months to issue a 3 page decision, without engaging in any of the arguments, said that Julian is not allowed to appeal."

38m50s

"How can this country the UK, possibly extradite him to the United States?"

============

It seems rather odd that she would be so naive at this point doesn't it. Is she acting?

Expand full comment
Mar 18Liked by Francis O'Neill

Very interesting. Thank you. I always found he was fishy. Endless layers of lies are the characteristics of our age. But definitely, if one has tons of space on the media, that's a clue.

Expand full comment
author
Mar 18·edited Mar 18Author

Thank you, Niki. Space on the media does not seem to be afforded to those who truly oppose the agenda.

Expand full comment
Mar 22Liked by Francis O'Neill

Have you seen? They are speaking about letting him free...the soap opera is going to end soon

Expand full comment
Mar 22Liked by Francis O'Neill

Very important imho. Only a few go down this rabbit hole.

I did the math back in the day with Chomsky after having been an aficionado of his for some years. It's a Truman Show, not only for the sheeple but also for those who think they know.

Now that it is on substack, the puppet masters know that we know. It's the honeypot for people that are too smart for facebook. ;-)

Expand full comment