Ive never been convinced one way or another about the planes. Although I do agree with your conclusion that the planes /no planes trope is a very useful way to discredit all the rest. ( Explosives in the buildings?! Guffaw etc…) At this point Im inclined to consider planes were used but not by the slapdash pilots as described. There is also the distraction of the plane allegedly crashing into the ground in PA w/o leaving any trace whatsoever of debris. But I suppose that story serves to aid in the there were no planes at all quibble.
Ive never been convinced one way or another about the planes. Although I do agree with your conclusion that the planes /no planes trope is a very useful way to discredit all the rest. ( Explosives in the buildings?! Guffaw etc…) At this point Im inclined to consider planes were used but not by the slapdash pilots as described. There is also the distraction of the plane allegedly crashing into the ground in PA w/o leaving any trace whatsoever of debris. But I suppose that story serves to aid in the there were no planes at all quibble.
Thanks, I've addressed these points and provided supporting evidence in the links in these two articles
Essential reading by Prof David Hughes...
How Not To Critique Judy Wood
Francis O'Neill's intellectually flimsy attack on Judy Wood bears all the hallmarks of propaganda, undermining his credibility as a dissident voice.
Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/how-not-to-critique-judy-wood
When Light is not Doing What it is Meant to Do?
A Study of the Second Plane Images on 9/11
An Independent Investigation
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/when-light-is-not-doing-what-it-is